Collective Emotional Expression as Digital Democracy: A Study of the “Komunitas MARAH MARAH” on Platform X

Ida Dwi Lestari Br Purba; Rizki Setiawan

doi:10.30601/humaniora.v10i1.7766

Collective Emotional Expression as Digital Democracy: A Study of the “Komunitas MARAH MARAH” on Platform X

Ida Dwi Lestari Br Purba, Rizki Setiawan

Abstract

The rapid development of digital spaces and social media has transformed public interaction, enabling new forms of democratic participation. This research investigates collective emotional expressions within the "Komunitas MARAH MARAH" on Platform X and their role in shaping public opinion and contributing to digital democracy, drawing on Jürgen Habermas's public sphere theory. A qualitative case study approach was employed, utilizing content analysis of community posts and in-depth interviews with seven active members. Data were triangulated from multiple sources to ensure validity. Findings reveal that the community primarily produces posts in three categories, criticism of government policies, socioeconomic grievances, and personal experiences sparking social reflection. While much of the discourse is emotionally charged and includes aggressive language, there are also evidence-based rational arguments. The community provides an accessible, equal space for voicing dissatisfaction, aligning with Habermas's ideal of open public discourse. However, structural domination persists through moderator enforced rules that limit open discussion, contradicting the ideal public sphere. Despite these limitations, the "Komunitas MARAH MARAH" functions as a counter-public, offering a platform for marginalized voices and informal digital democracy practices.

Keywords

Collective Emotions; Digital Democracy; Komunitas MARAH MARAH; Public Sphere; Habermas; Social Media

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. N. H. Robi’ah, “Media Sosial sebagai Ruang Publik Virtual Bagi Mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya”, PUBLIQUE, vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 1-24. 2020.

R. Wahyudi, M. Musliadi, M. Muhlis, and F. Faridah, “Ruang publik, Media sosial, Demokrasi, dan Pendekatan kritis.”, Retorika, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 17-32. 2024.

S. N. Sari and A. A. Wibowo, “Analisis fenomenologi Komunitas MARAH MARAH sebagai media emotional expression di media sosial X”, Komunikasi Nusantara, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 100-110. 2025.

Zakiyah, R. Agnia, H. S. Handayani, A. Davika, A. Ramdani, and M. Z. Syafiq, “Diskursus Publik dan Relevansi Dengan Legitimasi Kekuasaan Dari Teori Habermas”, Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 9-17. 2024.

P. B. Rutledge and J. L. C. Hogg, “In-depth interviews”, International Encyclopedia of Psychology, pp. 1-7. 2020.

R. A. Amellia, E. A. Sari, A. Zulfiqor, A. Almaas, G. N. Cahyo, and K. P. Nisa, “Pola interaksi online pengguna X terhadap komunitas “Marah-Marah” di platform X”, Akademik Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 54-67. 2024.

S. Schroeder, “Digital Public Spheres and Their Democratic Potentials”, Society, vol. 60, pp. 345-359. 2023.

C. Judhita, “Opini Publik Terhadap Kasus 3KPK Lawan Polisi dalam Polisi dalam Media Sosial Twitter Public Opinion on Case 3Police Versus K3 in Twitter”, Pekommas, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 61-70. 2014.

C. Judhita, “The Phenomenon of “Indonesia Gelap” on social media: Sentiment Analysis and Public Opinion Polarization”, Komunikasi, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 157-170. 2025.

S. Fatimah, “Transformasi Ruang Publik Digital: Tantangan Sosial dan Konstitusional dalam Demokrasi Era Media Baru”, Litbang Kebijakan, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 67-86. 2025.

I. Z. A. Fatih, “Peran Media Sosial dalam Kampanye Politik di Indonesia Lima Tahun Terakhir: Antara Demokrasi dan Manipulasi Informasi”, Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 2227-2237. 2024.

R. D. Kusumastuti and A. S. Kusuma, “Angkringan Sebagai Ruang Publik Dan Sarana Interaksi Sosial di Kota Bogor”, Pustaka Komunikasi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 91-105. 2022.

C. I. Ukarana, M. Suharbillah, A. F. Istiqomah, and P. K. Nisa, “Respons terhadap Komunitas AnieSpace sebagai Bentuk Ruang Publik Baru”, Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 165-178. 2024.

I. D. Rizkiyah, “Interaksi Manusia sebagai Makhluk Sosial dalam Ruang Publik menurut Jürgen Habermas: Studi Kasus Pameran Metamorfosart 6”, Kajian Ilmu seni, Media dan Desain, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 23-32. 2025.

E. Arditama, “Mengkaji Ruang Publik dari Perspektif Kuasa: Fenomena Kemenangan Aktor Hegemonik Melalui Dominasi Budaya”, Indonesian Political Science Review, vol. 1, vo. 1, pp. 69-86. 2016.

A. Chmiel, J. Sienkiewicz, M. Thelwall, G. Paltoglou, K. Buckley, A. Kappas, and J. A. Hołyst, “Collective Emotions Online and Their Influence on Community Life”, PLOS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, e22207, 2011.

M. Traversa, Y. Tian, and S. C. Wright, “Cancel culture can be collectively validating for groups experiencing harm”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, 1181872, 2023.

C. Baden, N. Kligler-Vilenchik, N. Springer, M. Jungblut, A. Zelenkauskaite, A. Balčytienė, S. Salgado, A. Lipiński, A. Krstic, and A. Bączkowska, “Public Opinion Negotiations in a Digital Media Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, vol. 37, no. 3, edaf049. 2025.

D. Andzani, D. Virgin, B. Pristica, and D. L. Dwihadiah, “Analisis Peran Media Sosial dalam Proses Mediatisasi Politik: Perspektif Komunikasi Politik dan Partisipasi Publik”, JMBI UNSRAT: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1003-1011. 2024.

S. Angga, A. A. Poa, and F. Rikardus, “Etika Komunikasi Netizen Indonesia Di Media Sosial Sebagai Ruang Demokrasi dalam Telaah Ruang Publik Jurgen Habermas”, Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 384-393. 2023.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30601/humaniora.v10i1.7766

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.